Message-Market Fit Sprint
Case Study: HR-Tech Startup
How We Ran a Messaging Sprint to Validate Bold Positioning in 2 Weeks with only a $500 Ad Spend
Follow along as we reveal the approach, insights, and actionable takeaways from this real-world experiment.

by Gabriel Bujold

Why We Ran This Sprint
First of, we've crafted a new positioning together, so our old messaging documentation was more or less relevant. We also just interviewed a few people and we needed to test our new messaging with specific angles that could resonate with our ICP.
Basically, this was a way for us to test the demand based on different messaging angles from gaps we've identified.
Lack of Real-World Validation
We had developed solid messaging foundations but needed to validate them through actual ICP behavior rather than assumptions
ICP Refinement Needed
Our target audience definition was too broad, reducing message resonance and conversion effectiveness
Trying to Go Upmarket
We were trying to expand the deal size and go upmarket to push enterprise deals. There's less accounts so we needed to test if a bolder point of view would catch their attention
As product marketers, we know that without validation through real market feedback, we risked investing significant resources into campaigns that might not resonate with our target customers.
The messaging sprint is something I've offered to one of my client as a low-risk method to gather actionable insights and refine our approach before committing to larger initiatives (like investing in a pricey outbound agency and more GTM resources)
Sprint Setup
Budget Allocation
$500 for paid advertising distributed across LinkedIn campaigns, complemented by organic content creation and outbound email efforts
Timeline Structure
Compressed 2-week testing period with defined measurement points for rapid iteration and learning
Channel Selection
Multi-channel approach using LinkedIn Ads for targeting + retargeting, outbound email for direct testing, organic social posts for reach, and a dedicated landing page for conversion
Our primary objectives were:
→ Boost SQL (Sales Qualified Lead) conversion rates from our marketing activities
→ Reduce competitor confusion among prospects.
This meant creating clear differentiation that would help potential customers understand our unique value against established HR solutions.
Messaging Hypothesis and Objectives
Core Messaging Hypothesis
"If we push bolder differentiation and urgency messaging at a narrower ICP, both SQL generation and win rates will increase substantially."
SQL Conversion Target
15-20% improvement in qualified lead conversion rates from landing page visitors and campaign respondents
Qualitative Objectives
Significant reduction in "competitor confusion" objections during sales conversations and improved engagement metrics including scroll depth and time on page
By establishing clear success metrics before launching the sprint, we created a framework for objectively evaluating results. This approach allowed us to move beyond subjective opinions about messaging effectiveness and instead focus on data-driven decision making throughout the two-week period.
What Angles We've Tested
Each messaging angle was strategically designed to test specific psychological triggers with our target audience.
→ The urgency angle leveraged fear of missing out and potential negative consequences.
→ The differentiation angle directly addressed how we solved problems that legacy Employee Assistance Programs (EAPs) couldn't.
→ The emotion angle connected our solution to meaningful human outcomes that resonated on a personal level.
Channel 1 → Paid Ads
After two weeks of testing and a $500 budget, our differentiation messaging generated the most significant website traffic at a reasonable cost-per-click of $1.89.
While emotion-based ads produced the highest click-through rate at 0.62%, they didn't convert as effectively on the landing page. Urgency messaging reached the widest audience with 11,700 impressions but performed weakest in CTR.
The key learning: Differentiation messaging provides the most efficient scaling opportunity, while emotion can be leveraged at the top of the funnel to generate initial interest.
Insights from Microsoft Clarity 💻
Differentiation Messaging
  • 80% average scroll depth
  • 2:45 average time on page
  • 42% clicked to product details
  • 16% form conversion rate
Urgency Messaging
  • 65% average scroll depth
  • 1:20 average time on page
  • 58% clicked early CTA buttons
  • 9% form conversion rate
Emotion Messaging
  • 72% average scroll depth
  • 2:10 average time on page
  • 36% clicked to testimonials
  • 11% form conversion rate
The key takeaway: proof-driven headlines consistently outperformed emotion-driven ones on conversion pages, suggesting that our ICP responds better to concrete differentiation points than emotional appeals when making decisions.
Channel 2 → Organic Content
10
LinkedIn Posts
Within 2 weeks
~18
Comments Activity / Post
Baseline before test was 5/post
15,900
Emotion Post Views
Highest organic reach from a single post
6.8%+
Engagement Rate
Baseline was ~2-3%
Organic content served as the emotional credibility engine for the campaign. While ads and email captured attention, organic posts built trust and drove social validation from HR leaders.
Across 10 posts, we saw a sharp uplift in both reach and engagement. One emotion-led post drove 15,900 views, while other high-performing content that paired differentiation messaging with proof points sustained an average engagement rate of 6%+. Posts that blended pain-led storytelling with evidence of impact consistently outperformed isolated emotional or product content.
This validates organic as the ideal channel to amplify the HR-Tech startup unique positioning, especially when tied to social proof and resonant language.
Final Sprint Outcomes
SQL Conversion
5% → 18% (+13%)
Outbound Reply Rate
6% → 9% (+3%)
Content Engagement
50% → 80% scroll depth
Our two-week messaging sprint delivered significant improvements across all key metrics:
→ SQL conversion rates jumped from 5% to 18%, exceeding our 15–20% target and validating the impact of sharper positioning and audience targeting.
→ Reply rates on outbound messaging rose from 6% to 9%, reflecting better resonance with differentiation-led copy.
→ In parallel, content engagement on landing pages improved dramatically, with scroll depth increasing from 50% to 80%—a strong indicator that our updated messaging kept prospects engaged beyond the first fold.
These results validate our core hypothesis: bold differentiation, targeted to a narrower ICP, drives both clarity and conversion.
The sprint also gave us a repeatable process for scaling high-performing messages across paid, organic, and outbound efforts.
Why should PMMs care?
Narrow your ICP
Focused messaging to specific segments yields better results than broad approaches
Test bold angles early
Safe messaging won't differentiate you in crowded markets, this type of test can bring influence early to truly test it instead of messaging by commitees
Start with small budgets
$500-$1,000 is sufficient for directional feedback, mainly on ads
Run 2-week sprints
Quick tests de-risk larger campaign investments, or gauge ahead your future launch messaging
The success of this messaging sprint demonstrates that product marketers don't need large budgets or extended timelines to validate positioning. By embracing a focused, experimental approach, you can gather actionable insights quickly and confidently scale what works.
Remember that the most effective messaging often emerges from testing bold hypotheses rather than playing it safe. A structured sprint methodology allows you to take calculated risks and measure real-world impact before committing significant resources to broader campaigns.
Trying to link messaging to revenue?
Learn how to run a proper messaging test or hire me to do it for you, check out our process and costs below 👇👇
Or book a messaging audit to see if demand testing is the right choice this quarter.
Made with